And you thought it was stuffy. Not!
For those of you who don’t read the Wall Street Journal because you think it’s too stuffy or highbrow for you, I disagree. Not only are you getting a clear view of the news, but there are really fascinating articles and, if you have a sense of humor, there’s some funny stuff there. Just notice how many times I refer to the WSJ in my blogs.
That’s where we first learned the word “kerfuffle”. About that word – I can’t tell you how disappointed I am that I can’t use it in my book. If you recall, I write Regency romance (London, England 1811-1820). One must be very careful not to have anachronistic words, ideas and the like in the stories. I can’t tell you how disappointed I was when I looked up the etymology of the world “kerfuffle” and it was first used in 1946. BAH! Too bad.
If you still don’t believe me that the WSJ is worth your time, then feast your eyes on this.
This was in an article titled, “Arts New Pecking Order” about China and their emerging artists.

Chinese culture emerging into the greater world as a super power and thus being Super Sized? Or that they are competing with the West and thus are becoming Americanized and fat?




Leave a Reply